'The most terrible ever': Trump lashes out at Time's 'super bad' cover picture.

It is a positive feature in a publication that Trump has consistently praised – with one exception. The front-page image, the president decreed, "may be the Worst of All Time".

Time's paean to Donald Trump's part in mediating a ceasefire in Gaza, headlining its early November edition, was accompanied by a photograph of the president taken from below and with the sun positioned behind him.

The result, the president asserts, is ""terrible".

"Time Magazine wrote a quite favorable story about me, but the image may be the Worst of All Time", he shared on his social media platform.

“They removed my hair, and then had something floating on top of my head that looked like a floating crown, but an remarkably little one. Really weird! I always disliked taking pictures from underneath angles, but this is a super bad picture, and merits public condemnation. Why did they do this, and why?”

The president has expressed no secret of his desire to be pictured on Time’s cover and achieved this on four occasions in the previous year. The preoccupation has extended to his golf courses – years ago, the publication requested to remove mocked up covers exhibited in several of his venues.

This issue's photograph was taken by a photographer for a news agency at the presidential residence on the fifth of October.

The shot's viewpoint did no favours for Trump’s chin and neck – an opening that California governor Newsom seized, with his communications team sharing an altered image with the problematic part obscured.

{The Israeli captives held in Gaza have been liberated under the first phase of the president's diplomatic initiative, together with a freeing of Palestinian inmates. The arrangement might turn into a defining accomplishment of the president's renewed tenure, and it may represent a strategic turning point for the region.

At the same time, a defence of the president’s appearance has been offered by a surprising origin: the director of information at Moscow's diplomatic office came forward to criticise the "revealing" picture decision.

"It’s astonishing: a photograph reveals far more about those who selected it than about the individual pictured. Only sick people, people filled with spite and resentment –perhaps even perverts – could have chosen such a photo", Maria Zakharova shared on her social channel.

"And given the complimentary photos of Biden that that magazine featured on the front, even with his age-related challenges, the story is simply self-incriminating for the publication", she noted.

The response to his queries – what were Time’s editors doing, and why? – might involve creatively capturing a sense of power according to an imaging expert, an Australian publication's photo editor.

The image itself is well-executed," she says. "They selected this photo because they wanted Trump to look heroic. Staring up at someone evokes a feeling of their grandeur and the president's visage actually looks contemplative and almost a bit ethereal. It’s not often you see photos of Trump in such a serene moment – the image has a softness to it."

His hair seems to vanish because the light from behind has washed out that area of the image, producing a glowing aura, she says. Even though the feature's heading complements his facial expression in the image, "one cannot constantly gratify the individual in question."

Few people appreciate being photographed from below, and while all of the conceptual elements of the image are highly effective, the aesthetics are not flattering."

The publication contacted the periodical for feedback.